Facebook censores and closes accountsDecember 28, 2012
But at least web news sources are free of censorship … one would hope.
Unfortunately, that’s not true.
Today, Facebook deactivated the Facebook accounts of some of the leading American political critics.
For example, former diplomat and U.C. Berkeley Professor Emeritus Peter Dale Scott told us that his Facebook account was suddenly deactivated today without any justification.
So did Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
And Michael Rivero, owner of the popular website What Really Happened.
• Kurt Nimmo, writer for Infowars.com and formerly Counterpunch
• Aaron Dykes of Infowars
• Jason from Infowars
• Infowar Artist
Indeed, Facebook told an Infowars reporter last year not to post anything political:
Be careful making about making political statements on facebook … facebook is about building relationships not a platform for your political viewpoint. Don’t antagonize your base. Be careful and congnizat (sic) of what you are preaching.
Reports are that the Facebook accounts of a number of other political critics were suspended or deactivated today as well, including:
• Amber Lyon, 3-time Emmy Award winning CNN reporter
• Robert M. Bowman, former director of the “Star Wars” defense program under President Ronald Reagan
• William Rodriguez, 9/11 hero
• Anthony J. Hilder, popular radio host
• William Lewis
• Weare Change, popular citizen journalism group
• Michael Murphy
• Mike Skuthan
• Packy Savvenas
• Sean Wright and Katherine Albrect
Facebook pays low-wage foreign workers to delete certain content based upon a censorship list. For example, Facebook deletes accounts created by any Palestinian resistance groups.
Many accuse Youtube of blatant censorship.
Reddit – the 133rd most popular website worldwide on the Internet – is also censoring.
I’m not talking about censoring specific websites (For example, I was informed today that Reddit’s News category censors all stories from this website. But that’s just an example). I’m talking about censoring entire categories of news media.
Specifically, Reddit’s WorldNews category has 2.5 million subscribers. Most tv news shows have less than 2.5 million daily viewers. So that means that Reddit’s WorldNews is itself a mainstream media source in terms of numbers. And many more people see WorldNews stories on the front page of Reddit, even if they are not subscribers to the WorldNews subreddit.
Yet WorldNews censors blogs, and doesn’t consider them real news sources. Here’s a discussion I had recently with WorldNews moderators:
In fact, the top independent experts in every field — economics, business, foreign affairs, military, science, energy, etc. — have their own blogs, making blogs one of the best sources of information, a good way to fact-check the mainstream news, and the best way to read the experts’ insights direct and unfiltered. See this, this and this.
Indeed, the whole reason that news blogs have become popular is that they get around the censorship which is ubiquitous in the mainstream television news. And social media is popular as a news source — especially among youth — because it pretends that it provides uncensored news, where a free market of popularity governs.
That’s obviously not the case, where specific websites — and entire classes of media, such as blogs — are barred.
Reddit holds itself out as a young, hip, progressive news source. But if it is censoring blogs, it fails to live up to any of these claims.
It is sad that the moderators of the social media sites themselves are doing the same thing.